帮忙分析一段话,看里面的resourse是否有用,fair use or unfair.给出原因,有追分,

帮忙分析一段话,看里面的resourse是否有用,fair use or unfair.给出原因,有追分,
There are other arguments to consider against same-sex marriage — for
example,the signals it would send,and the impact of such signals on the
shaping of human sexuality,particularly among the young.Former Harvard
professor E.L.Pattullo has written that “a very substantial number of people
are born with the potential to live either straight or gay lives.” Societal
indifference about heterosexuality and homosexuality would cause a lot of
confusion.A remarkable 1993 article in The Post supports this point.Fifty
teenagers and dozens of school counselors and parents from the local area were
interviewed.According to the article,teenagers said it has become “cool” for
students to proclaim they are gay or bisexual — even for some who are not.Not
surprisingly,the caseload of teenagers in “sexual identity crisis” doubled in
one year.“Everything is front page,gay and homosexual,” according to one
psychologist who works with the schools.“Kids are jumping on it ...
[counselors] are saying,“What are we going to do with all these kids
proclaiming they are bisexual or homosexual when we know they are
not?”
In this excerpt,attempt to assess whether Bennett's use of
DeNeen L.Brown's article represents a fair use or an unfair use.However you
evaluate it,give the rationale (the "why") for your evaluation.
原文a normal part of adolescent growth is a period of confusion about sexual identity,Holmes said,but he said some teenagers may be going through a form of rebellion as well
原文另一段：Although there is no indication that the number of homosexual young peple is increasing,there has been an increase in the number of teenagers questioning whether they are heterosexual,people who work with teenagers say Mental health professionals point out that adolescence is a time of sexual experimentation of various kinds and that it is too early for most teenagers to really know if they are homosexual,bisexual or heterosexual.
用原文这两段话分析这篇文章的引用是Unfair的(英文）。英语好的帮忙下,

不是很理解你的问题所要问的东西,你截取的文字主要讨论了美国社会对同性婚姻的肯定引发的对特别是青少年不良影响的一些担忧,特别是93年邮报的一个报告提出有相当数量的青少年因为觉得标新立异,可以出风头,对校方谎称自己是同性恋者.这些直接导致校方以及家长的担忧,进而又一些精神学科专家也指出由此可能引发青年人对同性恋,异性恋的模糊概念,增加负面影响.
再问： 93年邮报的内容就是我截取的那两段文章的一部分，然后却并不贴切第一段文章的中心思想，大概是这样的。
再答： 那你想问什么呢？真不太懂
再问： 要问的是在第二段，就回答第一段当中的引用是不是适用第一段的整体内容。答案已知是Unfair use,如果要看93年邮报原文的 我可以找照下来，但是关键点还是在我截取的那两段。假如真没人能答我都不知道怎么办了。
再答： 引用的邮报内容讨论的是青少年对同性恋和异性恋的认知担忧，和一开始说得对同性婚姻的议题关系不大，如果说是不是切合这个主题，那就是跑题了。
再问： 大致是这样的，能帮忙用英文分析下吗，感激不尽~~谢谢，最后这一问我就采纳了。 第一段是讲的作者he intends to use to support the reason that allowing same-sex marriage will negatively influence the developing sexual identities of the young,
再答： The article quoted from the Post is more talking about confusion where teenagers were accordingly affectted to question upon the sexual identiy, than the orginal topic where is discussing the homosexual marriage. Thus it comes to the unfair use.