百度作业网英文辩论 评委常用的句子
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：百度作业网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/06/09 17:53:33
英文辩论 评委常用的句子
也许要从语法上,从内容上等各方面进行评论,还有说下总结性的话.望高手给点耐心,
一楼无脑请走开。
也许要从语法上,从内容上等各方面进行评论,还有说下总结性的话.望高手给点耐心,
一楼无脑请走开。
Usage of English:
The student was careful in using proper tense and correct grammar,and made very few mistakes.
The student's English left a lot to be desired.At times it was hard to understand what he was trying to say.
Speaking style:
The student had a good speaking style.He was polite but firm,and never raised the voice.
Shouting is not a way to win a debate.This student constantly interrupted other people and shouted over others.
Substance:
Student A seemed better prepared and made better use of specific facts than his opponent.
He presented his case with more confidence and clarity.
The student made poor use of evidence.The facts often did not support his argument.
Persuasiveness:
He organized arguments in a persuasive manner,and made a compelling case for his side.
This student perhaps needed to do a better job of answering a question at the back of the listeners' minds:(fill in your question)?
Logic:
The logic of the argument was clear.
There was no logical connection between two parts of the argument.
The logic was confused.
Overall,I think he did an excellent job.
Overall,he gave a better presentation.
Overall,I think he could have done better.
Overall,I judge his performance to be unsatisfactory.
The student was careful in using proper tense and correct grammar,and made very few mistakes.
The student's English left a lot to be desired.At times it was hard to understand what he was trying to say.
Speaking style:
The student had a good speaking style.He was polite but firm,and never raised the voice.
Shouting is not a way to win a debate.This student constantly interrupted other people and shouted over others.
Substance:
Student A seemed better prepared and made better use of specific facts than his opponent.
He presented his case with more confidence and clarity.
The student made poor use of evidence.The facts often did not support his argument.
Persuasiveness:
He organized arguments in a persuasive manner,and made a compelling case for his side.
This student perhaps needed to do a better job of answering a question at the back of the listeners' minds:(fill in your question)?
Logic:
The logic of the argument was clear.
There was no logical connection between two parts of the argument.
The logic was confused.
Overall,I think he did an excellent job.
Overall,he gave a better presentation.
Overall,I think he could have done better.
Overall,I judge his performance to be unsatisfactory.